An
article about Residential Colleges appeared in the New York Times this week. It was nice to see mention of the RC at the University of Michigan. For a school as large as U of M, the RC offered a unique opportunity to foster a tightly knit community of learning within the larger college of Literature Arts and Sciences. The program was made up of interdisciplinary classes that combined literate, history, political science, philosophy, art, and language. For example, some standout classes included "Social Dynamics of Science, Technology and Medicine," "The Subject in the Aftermath of Revolution," and "Globalization and Its Discontents." To emphasize understanding as a metric of performance rather than an abstract letter grade, the RC did without them. Instead of getting grades in my classes, I was given written evaluations detailing my performance and contribution.
Harvard Business School also does not hand out grades, from what I hear. As an MBA program, maybe they're onto something that colleges like the RC at U of M figured out years ago.
I am grateful for my RC experience. It made me appreciate that you cannot study any subject within a vacuum. Far too many in academia become so specialized that they lose the ability to conceptualize from a high-level understanding. The RC helped me realize that knowledge is more about apprehending the causes and connections than the a priori facts. This fall, the
RC will celebrate its 40th Anniversary. If my schedule allows it, I'm going to finally make the trip back to Ann Arbor.
Found this flash video that nicely explains how the RC is about being proactive and taking responsibility rather than reacting to lectures and asking what one needs to do to get an 'A.'